Why Scoping Matters
Clear scoping is the foundation of accurate estimation:Reduces Estimation Errors
Well-scoped work is easier to size accurately because complexity is visible upfront
Prevents Scope Creep
Explicit boundaries make it clear when a request goes beyond the original agreement
Improves Scheduling
Broken-down work is easier to assign, track, and complete incrementally
Builds Client Trust
Clear scope documents show professionalism and set realistic expectations
The Scoping Process
Follow these steps to scope work effectively:1
Understand the Requirement
Goal: Grasp what the client actually needs (not just what they said)Questions to ask:
- What problem are we solving?
- What’s the desired outcome or user experience?
- Who is the user or audience?
- Are there examples or references we can look at?
- Vague language (“make it better,” “improve performance”)
- Missing context (who, why, when)
- Assumptions without validation
2
Define What's Included
Goal: Be explicit about deliverables and boundariesSpecify:
- Exact deliverables (e.g., “3 page designs,” “API endpoint for user login”)
- Platforms or devices (desktop, mobile, tablet?)
- Environments (development, staging, production?)
- Documentation or handoff materials
- ✅ “Homepage hero section: desktop and mobile designs with 2 feedback rounds”
- ❌ “Homepage design”
3
Define What's Excluded
Goal: Prevent scope creep by stating explicit boundariesCommon exclusions:
- Additional pages or features not mentioned
- Content creation (copy, images, etc.)
- Third-party integrations beyond specified ones
- Performance optimization (unless explicitly included)
- “This quote includes the contact form only. Email template design is not included and can be quoted separately if needed.”
4
Identify Dependencies and Risks
Goal: Surface blockers and complexity factorsDependencies to note:
- Requires API from another task
- Needs client to provide content or assets
- Depends on third-party service or approval
- Must wait for design/development from another requirement
- Unfamiliar technology or APIs
- Legacy codebase or technical debt
- Unclear or incomplete requirements
- Tight deadline or hard launch date
5
Break Into Smaller Pieces
Goal: Split large work into estimable, deliverable chunksBreak by:
- Phase: Design → Development → Testing
- Component: Header → Nav → Footer
- Feature: User registration → Login → Password reset
- Platform: Desktop → Mobile → Tablet
- If it feels like XXL (40-120 hours), try to split it
- Aim for pieces that are M (3-6 hrs) to L (8-16 hrs) when possible
- Each piece should be independently deliverable and testable
6
Document the Scope
Goal: Create a written record that everyone agrees onInclude in the scope description:
- Summary of the work
- What’s included (bulleted list)
- What’s explicitly excluded
- Assumptions and dependencies
- Deliverables and acceptance criteria
Scoping by Work Type
Design Scoping
Design work needs clarity on deliverables, fidelity, and feedback rounds:What to Include
What to Include
- Number of screens or pages
- Fidelity level (wireframes, mockups, high-fidelity)
- Responsive breakpoints (desktop, tablet, mobile)
- Number of feedback rounds included
- Assets provided (icons, images, or sourced by designer?)
What to Clarify
What to Clarify
- Is branding already defined, or is this part of the work?
- Are there existing design systems or patterns to follow?
- What format do deliverables need to be in (Figma, Sketch, PNG, etc.)?
- Are animations or interactions included?
Common Pitfalls
Common Pitfalls
- Not specifying number of feedback rounds (leads to endless revisions)
- Unclear on responsive design expectations
- Assuming client will provide assets when they expect you to source them
Development Scoping
Development work needs technical clarity and boundaries:What to Include
What to Include
- Functional requirements (what the feature does)
- Technical approach (API endpoints, database changes, etc.)
- Browser/device support
- Testing scope (unit tests, integration tests, manual QA)
- Deployment (dev, staging, production)
What to Clarify
What to Clarify
- Is the design finalized, or are we building based on wireframes?
- Are there existing components or patterns to follow?
- What’s the acceptable loading time or performance threshold?
- Does this need to work offline or with slow connections?
Common Pitfalls
Common Pitfalls
- Not accounting for API changes or backend work
- Assuming existing code is reusable when it’s not
- Underestimating complexity of third-party integrations
- Forgetting about edge cases and error handling
Scoping Complex Requirements
Large or complex requirements need structured breakdown:Example: E-commerce Checkout Flow
Instead of one massive requirement (“Build checkout”), break it down:- ❌ Too Vague
- ✅ Well-Scoped
Requirement: “Build checkout flow”Problems:
- What’s included? Cart, payment, shipping, order confirmation?
- What payment methods?
- Guest checkout or login required?
- Shipping address, billing address, or both?
Scoping in Quotes
When creating quotes in CharleOS, each requirement block includes a scope description:Anatomy of a Good Scope Description
Tips for Writing Scope Descriptions
Be Specific, Not Exhaustive
Be Specific, Not Exhaustive
You don’t need to list every line of code, but be clear on key deliverables and boundaries.Good: “Contact form with name, email, message fields. Includes validation and email sending.”Too vague: “Build contact form.”Too detailed: “Contact form with: firstName (string, required, max 50 chars), lastName (string, required, max 50 chars)…” [continues for 20 lines]
Use Bullet Points
Use Bullet Points
Bulleted lists are easier to scan than paragraphs. Break up text into digestible chunks.
State Assumptions Explicitly
State Assumptions Explicitly
If your estimate depends on something being true, say so:
- “Assumes API docs are accurate”
- “Assumes client provides copy and images”
- “Assumes existing authentication system is functional”
Highlight Risks
Highlight Risks
If there are known risks or unknowns, call them out:
- “Third-party API documentation is sparse—may require extra discovery time”
- “Legacy codebase lacks tests—QA time may increase”
Handling Ambiguous Requests
Sometimes clients provide vague or incomplete requirements. Here’s how to handle them:Strategy 1: Ask Clarifying Questions
- Client Says
- You Ask
- Outcome
“We need to improve the website performance.”
Strategy 2: Offer a Discovery Phase
When unknowns are high, quote a small discovery task first:Discovery Task (S or M): Investigate the requirement, document findings, and provide a detailed estimate for the implementation.Benefits:
- Low-risk investment for the client
- You get clarity before committing to a large estimate
- Uncovers hidden complexity early
- Client: “Integrate with [third-party API]”
- You: “Let’s start with a discovery task (S, 1-2 hours) to review their API docs, test authentication, and identify integration points. Then we’ll provide a detailed quote for the implementation.”
Strategy 3: Provide Multiple Options
Offer tiered scopes with different levels of effort: Example: “Website Redesign”| Option | Scope | Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | Homepage only, existing branding, 2 feedback rounds | L (8-16 hours) |
| Standard | Homepage + 3 key pages, existing branding, 3 feedback rounds | XL (24-40 hours) |
| Premium | Full site (10 pages), updated branding, unlimited feedback | XXL (40-120 hours) |
Scoping Red Flags
Watch out for these warning signs that scope is unclear:Vague Language
Vague Language
Red flags:
- “Make it look more modern”
- “Improve the UX”
- “Optimize the site”
- “Add some features”
Open-Ended Scope
Open-Ended Scope
Red flags:
- “Design the homepage (and other pages as needed)”
- “Build the feature (with integrations to be determined)”
- “Unlimited revisions”
Missing Acceptance Criteria
Missing Acceptance Criteria
Red flags:
- No definition of “done”
- No way to validate the work is complete
- “We’ll know it when we see it”
Unrealistic Expectations
Unrealistic Expectations
Red flags:
- “Build a Shopify competitor in 40 hours”
- “Redesign the entire site by next week”
- “Make it perfect with no bugs”
Scoping Best Practices
Start with the End in Mind
Start with the End in Mind
Define the desired outcome first, then work backward to scope the steps needed to get there.Question: What does success look like when this is done?
Use Examples and References
Use Examples and References
Visual examples clarify ambiguity:
- “Like the filter on Amazon”
- “Similar to the hero section on [example site]”
- “Mockup attached showing the layout”
Involve the Team
Involve the Team
Don’t scope in isolation. Get input from:
- Designers (if dev work relies on design)
- Developers (if design needs to be technically feasible)
- PMs (for client context and history)
Document Assumptions
Document Assumptions
Write down what you’re assuming to be true:
- “Assumes client provides content”
- “Assumes existing API supports this use case”
- “Assumes no major browser compatibility issues”
Review Similar Past Work
Review Similar Past Work
Look at past quotes and tasks with similar scope:
- How was the scope defined?
- Did scope creep occur?
- What was missed in the original scoping?
When Scope Changes
Even well-scoped work can encounter scope changes during delivery. Here’s how to handle it:Recognize Scope Creep
Signs that scope is expanding:- Client requests features not in the original scope
- “While you’re at it, can you also…” requests
- Requirements that seemed simple turn out to be complex
- New stakeholders introduce new requirements
How to Address It
1
Acknowledge the Change
“This request is outside the original scope of [requirement name], which included [original scope summary].”
2
Assess the Impact
- How much additional time is required?
- Does it block current work?
- Is it a small add-on or a significant change?
3
Propose a Solution
Option 1: “We can add this as a separate requirement (estimated M, 3-6 hours).”Option 2: “We can include this, but it will increase the estimate from M to L.”Option 3: “We can do this in a future phase to keep the current work on track.”
4
Get Agreement
Don’t proceed with expanded scope without client approval and updated estimates.