Skip to main content
These examples show how the billing formula applies in real scenarios. Each example walks through the calculation step by step.

Quick Reference

The billing formula for each requirement:

Example 1: Fast Completion (Banked Time)

A developer finishes efficiently, beating the quoted average. Task: Update checkout flow Requirement: Development, sized M (3-6 hours) Calculation:
Result:
  • Client pays: 4.5 hours (the quoted average)
  • Team worked: 3 hours
  • Banked time: 1.5 hours (profit margin)
Banked time rewards efficiency. The team completed quality work in less time, creating margin for the agency.

Example 2: Normal Completion

Work takes longer than average but stays within the quoted range. Task: Build product filters Requirement: Development, sized L (8-16 hours) Calculation:
Result:
  • Client pays: 14 hours (actual time)
  • Team worked: 14 hours
  • No banked time or overage
This is the expected outcome when estimates are accurate but the work is on the complex side of the range.

Example 3: Overrun (Capped)

Work exceeds the maximum, but the client is protected by the cap. Task: Integrate payment gateway Requirement: Development, sized L (8-16 hours) Calculation:
Result:
  • Client pays: 16 hours (the maximum cap)
  • Team worked: 22 hours
  • Overage: 6 hours (absorbed by agency, non-billable)
Overage is a red flag. Review why this happened—was the scope larger than expected? Was there technical debt? Should the estimate have been XL?

Example 4: Multi-Requirement Task

A task with both design and development, each calculated separately. Task: Redesign account settings page

Design Requirement (sized M)

Development Requirement (sized L)

Task Totals

Result: Despite development taking longer, the design efficiency created 1 hour of banked time overall.

Example 5: Tiny Task (XS)

Small tasks use the same formula, just with smaller numbers. Task: Fix typo on contact page Requirement: Development, sized XS (0-30 mins) Calculation:
Result:
  • Client pays: 15 mins
  • Team worked: 10 mins
  • Banked: 5 mins
Even tiny efficiency gains add up across many small tasks.

Example 6: Large Task (XXL)

Large tasks follow the same rules but with bigger stakes. Task: Build customer portal MVP Requirement: Development, sized XXL (40-120 hours) Calculation:
Result:
  • Client pays: 95 hours (actual)
  • Within the quoted range
  • No banked time or overage

Common Patterns

Pattern: Consistent Small Gains

When the team regularly finishes 10-20% under average: Interpretation:
  • Team is efficient
  • Estimates may be slightly conservative
  • Good profit margins

Pattern: Occasional Overruns

Mixed results with some tasks going over: Interpretation:
  • Mostly healthy
  • Task C needs investigation—why the overrun?
  • Net positive despite one problem task

Pattern: Systemic Underestimation

When overruns are frequent: Interpretation:
  • Serious estimation problem
  • 8 hours of non-billable work
  • Need to review estimation process
  • Consider bumping future tasks up a size

Month-End Rollover Example

Showing how billable hours affect next month’s allocation. Client: TechStart Inc Monthly allocation: 60 hours

Month 1 Tasks

Rollover calculation:
  • Allocated: 60 hours
  • Billable: 62 hours
  • Rollover: 2 hours

Month 2

  • Base allocation: 60 hours
  • Minus rollover: 2 hours
  • Available: 58 hours
PM plans Month 2 work to fit within 58 hours.

Billing Model

The formula explained

T-Shirt Sizing

Size definitions and ranges

Hour Rollover

How hours carry between months

Efficiency

Understanding banked time and overage